Gowtham R's Blog

QA testing

Gowtham R's photo
Gowtham R
·

8 min read

1 )Difference between automated and manual testing !

tomated Testing: Automated testing is like having a robot do the heavy lifting when it comes to checking if your software works as expected. Imagine you have a little virtual assistant that follows a script, clicks buttons, fills in forms, and compares results with what you expected. This virtual assistant can run the same tests over and over again, ensuring that even tiny changes don't break your software. Automated testing is efficient and speedy, especially for repetitive tasks and large projects. It's like having a tireless worker who never gets bored doing the same task repeatedly. However, creating and maintaining these automated tests requires some initial effort and technical know-how.

Manual Testing: On the other hand, manual testing is a bit like having a human explorer meticulously checking every nook and cranny of your software. It involves real people sitting down and using the software just like a regular user would. These human testers get to feel the software, click the buttons, and observe if everything behaves as expected. Manual testing is great for catching unexpected issues and providing a user's perspective. It's like having a detective who can notice small details or peculiar behaviors that an automated script might miss. However, it can be time-consuming, especially for repetitive tasks, and it relies on the tester's attention to detail.

In a nutshell, automated testing is like having a reliable robot that quickly and tirelessly checks if everything is in order, while manual testing is like having a human detective who explores and scrutinizes the software for any unexpected surprises. Both approaches complement each other in ensuring the quality of the software. Automated testing is efficient for repetitive tasks, and manual testing provides a more intuitive and exploratory perspective.

2 ) Here are some of the most common automation tools available on the market;

The most common automation tools used in the software industry for various purposes, including functional testing, performance testing, and continuous integration:

  1. Selenium:

    • Purpose: Automation of web browsers for testing web applications.

    • Key Features:

      • Supports multiple programming languages (Java, C#, Python, etc.).

      • Cross-browser testing capabilities.

      • Integration with various testing frameworks.

  2. Appium:

    • Purpose: Automation of mobile applications on iOS and Android platforms.

    • Key Features:

      • Supports multiple programming languages.

      • Cross-platform mobile testing.

      • Works with native, hybrid, and mobile web applications.

  3. Jenkins:

    • Purpose: Automation of building, testing, and deploying software.

    • Key Features:

      • Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) capabilities.

      • Large plugin ecosystem.

      • Easy integration with other tools.

  4. Jira:

    • Purpose: Project management and issue tracking, including test management.

    • Key Features:

      • Customizable workflows for different types of projects.

      • Integration with various testing and development tools.

      • Comprehensive reporting and analytics.

  5. TestNG:

    • Purpose: Testing framework inspired by JUnit and NUnit.

    • Key Features:

      • Supports parallel execution of test methods.

      • Flexible test configuration.

      • Integrated with various tools and reports.

  6. JUnit:

    • Purpose: Java testing framework for unit testing.

    • Key Features:

      • Annotations for test setup and teardown.

      • Parameterized tests for data-driven testing.

      • Extensive community support.

  7. Apache JMeter:

    • Purpose: Performance testing and load testing of applications.

    • Key Features:

      • Supports various protocols like HTTP, JDBC, FTP, etc.

      • Distributed load testing capabilities.

      • Extensible through plugins.

  8. Cucumber:

    • Purpose: Behavior-driven development (BDD) tool for collaboration between developers and non-technical stakeholders.

    • Key Features:

      • Uses Gherkin syntax for writing human-readable scenarios.

      • Supports multiple programming languages.

      • Integrates with various testing frameworks.

  9. Postman:

    • Purpose: API testing and development tool.

    • Key Features:

      • User-friendly interface for sending requests and testing APIs.

      • Supports automation of API tests.

      • Collaboration features for teams.

  10. Git:

    • Purpose: Version control system for tracking changes in source code during software development.

    • Key Features:

      • Distributed version control.

      • Branching and merging capabilities.

      • Integrates with various CI/CD tools.

These tools cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle, from testing and performance monitoring to project management and version control. The choice of a particular tool often depends on the specific needs and requirements of a project or organization.

3) What is cross browser testing !

Cross-browser testing is the practice of testing a web application or website across different web browsers to ensure consistent and reliable behavior for users regardless of the browser they are using. The goal of cross-browser testing is to identify and address any compatibility issues or discrepancies in the way a web page is rendered or functions across various browsers.

Here are the key aspects of cross-browser testing:

  1. Browser Compatibility:

    • Different web browsers (e.g., Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Safari) may interpret HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code differently. Cross-browser testing aims to verify that a web application works correctly and appears consistently across these various browsers.

  2. User Experience Consistency:

    • Users may access a website using different browsers and devices. Cross-browser testing ensures a consistent and positive user experience across diverse environments. This includes checking the layout, styling, and functionality of the web pages.

  3. Functional Testing:

    • Cross-browser testing involves validating the functionality of a web application on different browsers. This includes interactive elements, form submissions, AJAX requests, and any JavaScript-driven features. It ensures that user interactions behave as expected across various browsers.

  4. Responsive Design:

    • With the rise of mobile devices, cross-browser testing also extends to ensuring a responsive design. The web application should adapt and provide a seamless experience on different screen sizes, resolutions, and orientations.

  5. Browser Version Compatibility:

    • Browsers release new versions regularly, and these updates may introduce changes in rendering engines or support for web standards. Cross-browser testing should cover a range of browser versions to account for users who may not always have the latest updates installed.

  6. Debugging and Issue Resolution:

    • Cross-browser testing helps identify and diagnose issues specific to certain browsers. When inconsistencies or problems are discovered, developers can address them by adjusting the code or using browser-specific workarounds.

  7. Automation for Efficiency:

    • To streamline the testing process, automation tools like Selenium, TestNG, or Cypress can be employed for cross-browser testing. Automated tests can be run across multiple browsers, reducing the time and effort required for manual testing.

By conducting cross-browser testing, development teams can ensure that their web applications deliver a consistent and reliable experience to users, regardless of the browser or device they choose. This practice is crucial for maintaining high-quality standards and user satisfaction in today's diverse and rapidly evolving digital landscape.

4) Blog on TDD and BDD;

Title: A Tale of Two Testing Approaches: TDD and BDD Unveiled

Introduction:

In the ever-evolving landscape of software development, testing methodologies play a pivotal role in ensuring the robustness and reliability of applications. Two popular approaches that have gained significant traction in recent years are Test-Driven Development (TDD) and Behavior-Driven Development (BDD). In this blog, we embark on a journey through the realms of TDD and BDD, exploring their principles, practices, and nuances.

Test-Driven Development (TDD):

TDD is a software development approach where tests are written before the actual code. The process unfolds in a series of iterative cycles: write a failing test, implement the code to make the test pass, and then refactor the code while keeping the tests green. This cycle, often referred to as the "Red-Green-Refactor" loop, ensures that the codebase is continually tested and improved.

Benefits of TDD:

  1. Early Bug Detection: TDD catches bugs early in the development process, reducing the cost of fixing issues later.

  2. Improved Code Quality: Developers are encouraged to write modular and maintainable code since TDD requires tests to be concise and focused.

  3. Documentation: Test cases serve as living documentation, providing insights into the expected behavior of the code.

  4. Confidence in Refactoring: The ability to refactor code confidently is a significant advantage of TDD. Developers can make changes knowing that the existing tests will quickly identify any regressions.

Behavior-Driven Development (BDD):

BDD, on the other hand, extends TDD by emphasizing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders such as product owners and business analysts. BDD focuses on the behavior of the system from the perspective of end-users, expressed in natural language specifications.

Key Elements of BDD:

  1. User Stories and Scenarios: BDD starts with user stories that define the behavior of the system. These stories are broken down into scenarios, which are concrete examples of how the system should behave.

  2. Given-When-Then Structure: BDD scenarios follow a structured format: Given a certain context, When a specific action occurs, Then a particular outcome is expected. This format helps in creating clear and understandable specifications.

  3. Living Documentation: Like TDD, BDD also generates living documentation that remains up-to-date with the evolving codebase. This documentation is accessible to both technical and non-technical team members.

  4. Automated Testing: BDD scenarios are often automated using tools like Cucumber or SpecFlow, allowing the translation of natural language specifications into executable tests.

Choosing the Right Approach:

While both TDD and BDD promote testing and collaboration, choosing the right approach depends on the project's requirements and the team's dynamics. TDD is ideal for ensuring code correctness and maintainability, while BDD excels in aligning development with business expectations.

Conclusion:

In the realm of software testing, Test-Driven Development and Behavior-Driven Development stand out as powerful methodologies that contribute to building robust, maintainable, and user-centric applications. TDD focuses on code correctness and developer-centric testing, while BDD extends this approach to involve stakeholders and ensure that the software meets business expectations. The choice between TDD and BDD depends on the specific needs of the project and the collaborative dynamics of the development team. Ultimately, both approaches share the common goal of delivering high-quality software through a rigorous and systematic testing process.

automation testing Automated Testingqa testingQA testers